I will preclude my statement by saying that your OP (original post) was easily the most shortsighted and arrogant thing I've ever heard, so I doubt you will value the input of a "hack" whose pb was achieved just running the boards...
I scored a 690,900 at over 1.035M pace in the WCQ2 and THAT WAS MY CHOICE.
I CHOSE to play at a high pace
I CHOSE to potentially lose to people of lower skill level
I CHOSE to go big and increase the level of difficulty of my game
I CHOSE to accept the fact that I would likely be beaten by less skilled individuals, simply due to statistics.
If you CHOOSE to play at that high of a pace and come up short, then maybe you just aren't good enough. That's how I felt, after I didn't get 1.035M+ in the WCQ2.
Rather then directing your self-dissatisfaction outward on the community, perhaps try putting it toward something PRODUCTIVE or POSITIVE, such as figuring out what kept you from reaching level 22 in your WCQ2 attempts.
All you had to do was make it to the end, and then you wouldn't have a soap box to stand on here, DO YOU SEE THE IRONY OF YOUR RIDICULOUS SUGGESTIONS. Just play a game to the end and let your SCORE DO THE TALKING.
I in no way support the separation of the DK community, you trying to tell someone how to play is SOCIALISM. From now on mary, I suggest we should only count scores from you that were achieved at a scoring rate of greater than 58K per level after level 19, unless you can show you are wearing a dress, then I will accept 57K, but the dress must be yellow and ITS A GIVEN THAT YOU MUST GO FOR TOP SHELF and your computer monitor can't be sideways, etc...
The above statement is about as logical as your OP.